Gus Yahya's Firm Response To Calls For His Resignation As PB NU Chairman

Saturday, 22 November 2025

    Share:
Author: Idris Rahmat
Kyai Haji Yahya Cholil Staquf, known as Gus Yahya, addresses demands for his resignation as Chairman of PB NU, emphasizing his focus on organizational procedures and rejecting pressures that threaten unity. (Faiq Azmi/detikJatim)

Jakarta - A significant internal discourse has emerged within Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Indonesia's largest Islamic organization, surrounding its leadership. Kyai Haji Yahya Cholil Staquf, widely known as Gus Yahya, has publicly addressed growing calls from certain quarters for him to step down from his position as Chairman of the NU Executive Board (Pengurus Besar Nahdlatul Ulama or PB NU). This development marks a critical moment for the century-old organization, testing its internal democratic mechanisms and unity.

The calls for resignation gained notable traction following public statements by two prominent NU figures: Muhyiddin Junaidi, a member of the NU Advisory Council (Syuriah), and Miftachul Akhyar, the former Chairman of PB NU. Their criticisms are reported to center on concerns regarding the direction of Gus Yahya's leadership, though specific, formal allegations within the organization's constitutional framework have not been fully detailed in public fora. This has created a complex situation blending personal critique with procedural organizational politics.

In his response, Gus Yahya adopted a stance grounded in institutional principle rather than personal confrontation. He unequivocally stated that he would not resign in response to what he characterized as external pressure or public demands. Instead, he emphasized that any leadership change must follow the official mechanisms and statutes (AD/ART) of Nahdlatul Ulama. This position frames the issue as a test of organizational integrity versus public opinion.

Read: Practical Savings Strategies: How To "Pay Yourself First" In A Volatile Economy

Central to Gus Yahya's rebuttal is his interpretation of the motives behind the resignation calls. He suggested that acceding to such demands would set a dangerous precedent, effectively allowing leadership to be determined by public campaigns or pressure from specific groups rather than through the NU's established democratic processes. He portrayed his steadfastness as a defense of the organization's sovereignty and institutional health.

The Chairman also redirected focus toward the broader mission of NU. He reiterated his commitment to the organization's foundational principles of benefiting society (amar ma'ruf nahi munkar) and maintaining national unity. By doing so, he implicitly contrasted what he views as disruptive political maneuvering with the substantive work of the organization under his stewardship, aiming to rally support from the NU base who prioritize social and religious programs over internal power struggles.

This internal rift occurs against a backdrop where NU's political and social influence is intensely scrutinized. As a body with deep roots and immense moral authority in Indonesian society, leadership stability within PB NU is often seen as reflective of broader religious and social stability. The public nature of this dispute, therefore, resonates beyond the organization's membership, attracting attention from political analysts and the national media.

The situation remains fluid, with the potential for escalation or resolution. The ultimate arbiter may be the upcoming NU National Conference (Muktamar), where broader leadership issues are traditionally settled. However, the immediate challenge is managing perceptions and preventing a deep, lasting schism within the ranks. Gus Yahya's strategy appears to be one of weathering the storm through procedural legitimacy and appeals to the silent majority of NU members.

The firm response from Gus Yahya underscores a pivotal moment of internal reckoning for Nahdlatul Ulama. It highlights the perpetual tension between charismatic leadership, institutional rules, and internal dissent within large mass organizations. The outcome will not only define Gus Yahya's tenure but also signal how one of Indonesia's most pivotal civil society institutions navigates conflict and renews its mandate in a modern context.

(Idris Rahmat)

    Share:
komentar